Clinical Integration Readiness Analysis CINs
Tuesday, January 26th, 2016Are You Ready for Clinical Integration?
When we take on a new clinical integration project, one of the first activities we advise is the performance of a snapshot clinical integration readiness analysis. The theory is that a future CIN needs to know where it is in the clinical integration process before it can plan where it needs to go and the steps that it needs to take. The initial assessment gives indications of the existing lay of the land and helps the organization shape an integration business model with a more accurate context.
Through this initial assessment process, we can identify structural or governance issues that may hamper further integration. The readiness assessment is only the beginning of a long road toward clinical integration. However, time spent on this initial stage can save significant time and effort in the long term.
During early assessment and design stages, we attempt to encourage broad participation by providers. We will normally recommend the creation of a governance and committee structure that is as inclusive as possible. Clinical integration is primarily a process that physicians perform. Mechanisms are created through which physicians collaborate across specialty, in an interdependent way toward the end goals of increasing quality and efficiencies. Ideally, the process should be collaborative between physicians and institutional providers. However, the dynamics between hospitals and physicians can sometimes adversely impact the working relationship.
Hospitals have been the center of the health care system through recent history. Changes in the health care system are beginning to change that paradigm. Health systems that recognize the realities of this shift will be at a competitive advantage in the future. In order to meet the challenges of the changing health care system, physicians and facilities need to collaborate. True change and collaboration cannot be forced on physicians. Failure to recognize this will put some institutions behind in the creation of the collaborative organizations that are required to compete in the future.
This factor will often manifest itself in the form of governance and control issues. A health care system may be reluctant to share governance and control with independent physicians. Failing to create shared governance models will predictably make physicians reluctant to become adequately engaged in the creation or operation of the system. Many projects shall cover governance and control issues and loose important momentum.
The degree of receptivity to joint governance and control is a significant indicator of potential success. This is an important issue that must be considered early in the assessment process. It is often difficult to “undo” the damage that can be inflicted over these issues early in the process.
John H. Fisher, CHC, CCEP is a health care attorney at the Ruder Ware law firm. He has been involved in the creation and representation of provider networks since the early 1990s. John has followed legal issues impacting provider groups for over 25 years. As such, he is knowledgeable on the current legal standards as well as the historic perspective that is often relevant to an appropriate analysis. He is currently involved advising providers and their counsel on the development of clinically integrated provider groups in various locations around the country.
